Ephesians 6:1-9
1 Children, obey your parents in the Lord, for this is right. 2 ‘Honour your
father and mother’—this is the first commandment with a promise: 3 ‘so that it may
be well with you and you may live long on the earth.’ 4 And, fathers,
do not provoke your children to anger, but bring them up in the discipline and
instruction of the Lord. 5 Slaves, obey
your earthly masters with fear and trembling, in singleness of heart, as you
obey Christ; 6 not only while being watched, and in order to please them, but as
slaves of Christ, doing the will of God from the heart. 7 Render service
with enthusiasm, as to the Lord and not to men and women, 8 knowing that
whatever good we do, we will receive the same again from the Lord, whether we
are slaves or free. 9 And, masters, do the same to
them. Stop threatening them, for you know that both of you have the same Master
in heaven, and with him there is no partiality.
Luke 13:30 ‘Indeed, some are last
who will be first, and some are first who will be last.’
It is a dangerous thing, to read the Bible. Something that I
believe should not be attempted alone. Look at the writings attributed to Paul.
Paul was a revolutionary, a visionary, and a true man of God. He was also
human, and a Jew, and an educated man in an age where to be a man was to be at
the top of the privileged heap. Paul’s words have been used to prolong and
justify the suppression of women, to deny acceptance, support and love for our
Gay, Lesbian, Bisexual and Transgender brothers and sisters and, as in this
passage we heard today, to keep fellow humans in slavery. How do we, as part of
a movement trying to eradicate the evil of slavery, inequality and violence,
find our truth in such words?
For all of his radical and innovative ideas about the true
nature of God as revealed in Christ, Paul as a proponent of the new Christian
Church movement had no interest in stirring up an already hostile society to
the point where this new fledged religion became a problem that had to be dealt
with. Admittedly, Paul didn’t have the advantage of having the Bible in front
of him for his perusal and guidance, and we don’t have the advantage of knowing
the exact context in which Paul was writing his letters. We are people of the
Word, and we have to take the Word of God as revealed in our Scriptures very
seriously. Having said that, what do we worship – our bible or our God?
To understand how Jesus can be found in this passage we have
to have a critical understanding of the context in which this matter was being
addressed. In Ephesians 6:1-9, following his words to husbands and wives, Paul
continues to give practical advice to those living under the one roof. Often a
family home included three generations and slaves. Men were the masters of
their households, and although some men and women undoubtedly loved each other,
society required that the man exercised total control over his affairs and his
family. This included the decision on whether infants of any kind, slave or
free, were to be kept or discarded. As long as a child’s father lived, the
child was under the father’s absolute power. The son or daughter could be a
grown person and still be beaten, and or at the father’s whim have their very
lives taken from them.
This is where Paul’s words become Christ like. Not only are
children called to obey their parents, but fathers in particular are called to
treat their children with love and respect. Once again we have a rule built on
relationship, giving guidelines for how to treat each other with mutual love
and respect. The promise of living in this way is that we will live long on
this earth – which taken at face value belies our experience of even the most
God honouring families who meet with turmoil and strife. Keeping in mind that
the Jewish understanding of a long and prosperous life was based on male
descendants, Paul’s reason for quoting this ‘promise’ was to draw attention to
the ideal that as people grew older, parents and children would not go their
separate ways, but care for each other in love.
Such a message was as important for the first century as it is for
today.
Trickier than this is the next few verses dealing with
slavery. These words, and those like it, were used to justify the practice of
slavery for centuries. Indeed, slavery in accepted within the scriptures as a
constant part of life and it is never explicitly condemned. American
slaveholders in the 19th century felt vindicated by Old Testament passages
regulating slavery and New Testament passages urging slaves to serve their
masters faithfully. At the same time, American slaves drew strength from the
Exodus story of the liberation of God’s people. Abolitionists founded their
cause on the biblical calls for justice and the simple dictum to “do to others
as you would have them do to you” (Matthew 7:12 and Luke 6:31).
Whether we like it or not, there are many instances in our
Bible where the actions of God and God’s people seem to call into question our
own understanding of right or wrong. How do we reconcile a God of love and
liberation with one that could seemingly endorse such practices as genocide,
violence towards women and slavery? There are many ways to do this. Some simply
accept that God has reasons for things that are beyond our knowing, and that
includes situations that we now see as intolerable. Others use these passages
as a reason to rail against the Bible and all it stands for, or go to the
opposite extreme and use the word of God to wound our brothers and sisters to
the point where reconciliation can be impossible. In my research for this
topic, many commentators used this passage to refer to the relationship between
employee and employer, as if this we can just ‘update’ the language to make it
more palatable to our modern ears.
For me, this is intolerable.
If we are to be authentic and faithful children of God, we
have to acknowledge and accept that sometimes, even the best of us get it
wrong. Sometimes, times change for the better – and we have to change with
them. At the time this letter was written, most of the Roman Empire were either
slaves or slave owners. It was a common, indeed, essential part of the Roman
economy. It was a radical, almost unthinkable idea that masters should treat
their slaves with any kind of empathy and compassion, let alone what we see as
basic human rights. To assert that slaves and masters were somehow answerable
to the same God, that indeed God shows no partiality to our earthly roles and
distinctions, was to walk on dangerous grounds.
Are we really so different today? Certainly the Church as a
whole has a long way to go before we are truly showing no partiality in our
acknowledgment in the basic humanity of all people. Thinking of the ‘clobber
texts’, as they are known, to justify the exclusion of people based on their
race or sexual orientation, are we really that much better than those who saw
slavery as not only a right but God given? How often do we allow the still
small voice of God to be heard as we race to improve and retain our own status
within society and the Church? What relationship dividers do we cling to
because we are too frightened to change?
It is a dangerous thing, to read the bible. But it also
contains the Good News. In God, there is no partiality. There is no longer Jew
or Greek, there is no longer slave or free, there is no longer male and female;
for we are all one in Christ Jesus. The last will be first, and the first will
be last. No matter how we read the bible, this is clear. We are loved. And we
are saved.
No comments:
Post a Comment